« Go back

MPs accept they can deal with the housing crisis – it’s time we saw this reflected in policy

10 Downing Street

As housing professionals, we often talk about the housing crisis, but what about the general public – the voters who will decide the outcome of the forthcoming general election?

When Ipsos MORI carried out a survey for us last month (January 2015), we found out just how widely the housing crisis is being felt. Three-quarters of the British public think there is a housing crisis in Britain. Perhaps not surprisingly, people living in London and renters (both private and social) are feeling the situation even more deeply, with eight out 10 agreeing that we have a housing crisis in Britain.

Ipsos MORI asked the same question of MPs – and two thirds agree there is a housing crisis in Britain. MPs also accepted that they have the power to change this situation – 86% disagree with the statement that ‘there isn’t much that British governments can do to deal with Britain’s housing problems’. It’s time we saw those sentiments being reflected in policy. We know that the government has the power to make a huge difference – by setting a national house building target, for example – so our challenge to all the parties ahead of the election is to show us what they could do to help, and commit to ending the housing crisis within a generation.

Our poll also highlighted one of the biggest challenges for the Homes for Britain campaign. While most people agreed there is a housing crisis in Britain, fewer felt that same sense of crisis in their local area (75% compared with 46%). I think this is because many people don’t see their personal circumstances as part of the housing crisis, even if they are directly affected – if they’re still living with their parents because they can’t afford to move out, for example, or if they’re having to put up with poor conditions in the private rented sector because they have no other option.

Our challenge is to show people how the housing crisis is affecting them – and if not them then their family, friends or neighbours. But we also need to demonstrate that this is a political problem, not just a personal one. MPs have the power to do something about it – but it is only if people start demanding change that they will sit up and take notice.

 


Support Homes for Britain online

Register your support
Follow @homesforbritain on Twitter
Like our Facebook page

Written by Grainia Long | Posted on 3rd February 2015

Chief executive, Chartered Institute of Housing

  • The Orbital Garden

    The problem with setting house building targets is that if they are set too low they are then used to justifying policies than can only achieve this.

    For example brownfield vs greenfield policy deliberately limits the building on new sites in order to push development on to existing brownfield.

    This limits and restrictions are based upon ONS produced figures for future housing and based upon complicated methodology.

    Does using @ONS predictions for needed @HomesforBritain making the #housingcrisis worse?

    https://t.co/6LwkuiBIWu

    The calculation uses predicted household size per areas (Avg. 2.3). This appears to reflect the adjusted current usage and not demand; so will simply move up if enough homes are not built. This will lead to an understatement of housing need.

    The method used should be based upon how people choose to live. So here is asuggestions on how this should be achieved.

    The adult population should be taken and remove all adults who are below the age which we expect children to leave home. This remaining population should then be used against the existing adult population density or expected adult density. This will be under 2 adults per home, as most people either choose to live with just their partner or themself (and children).

    This would show that we are actually currently short of far more homes than reported. Without this being debated I fear that their will not be answer to the housing crisis.